Legal Opinion

Whinery v. Hammond Trust & Savings Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1923No. 11,479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.

The only question for our determination is whether or not the trial court erred in its action on the petition filed by the guardian ad litem. We have set out the pleadings, the finding, and the decree, in the main action, for the reason that they are inseparably connected with the question to be decided in this appeal. The main action is the source of those elements which exert a controlling influence on the questions whether an allowance ought to be made; and if so; by whom the allowance ought to be paid.

It is apparent that the complaint was intended to serve a double purpose: (1) as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spencer v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Walker v. HallettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  3. Miedreich v. RankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Hutchinson v. HutchinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Richardson v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Paul Insurance Company v. CarlyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Keating v. Bingham, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fuehring v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API