Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1994No. 9314SC1087Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge Lewis

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent from that part of the opinion which holds that the failure to instruct on the “no duty to retreat” doctrine violates *243the defendant’s constitutional rights. The majority cites State v. Marshall, 105 N.C. App. 518, 414 S.E.2d 95, disc. review denied, 332 N.C. 150, 419 S.E.2d 576 (1992), and State v. Camacho, 337 N.C. 224, 446 S.E.2d 8 (1994), to support its conclusion. However, I do not believe that those cases control here. In Camacho, the Supreme Court recently held that the failure to instruct on a lesser included…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CamachoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API