Legal Opinion

Davenport v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1995No. A94A2094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Following a jury trial, the appellant, David L. Davenport, pro se, was found guilty of the offense of taking lost or mislaid property, and appeals such conviction.

1. Davenport first enumerates as error, the trial court’s failure to establish that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to counsel in electing to proceed pro se.

“A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege. The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Woodington Electric, Inc. v. Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Fadness v. KuntzMontana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API