Legal Opinion

Chester MARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Geri SOLCUM; Terri Solcum, Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1996No. 96-15877PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Per curiam

On April 26, 1996, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“the Act”), Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, was signed into law. A provision of the Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (as amended), applies to prisoner proceedings in forma pauperis and requires us to dismiss an appeal sua sponte at any time if the case is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief. This appeal requires us to determine whether section 1915(e)(2) applies to appeals pending in this court on the date of its enactment. We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Mitchell v. FarcassCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Geoffrey Benson v. Greg O'BrianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Brewster v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Duane Belanus v. Phil ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API