Legal Opinion

Krutel v. Krutel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 23, 1982No. 81-1811Published

1Per curiam

The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed on the grounds that (a) the record clearly demonstrates that the parties stipulated to the matters now appealed, Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank, 252 So.2d 1 (Fla.1971); Dorson v. Dorson, 393 So.2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Groover v. Groover, 383 So.2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Co., N.A., 374 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 202 (Fla.1980); Barr v. Ehrlich, 301 So.2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Curr v. Helene Transportation Corp., 287 So.2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), and (b) no error or abuse of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Dorson v. DorsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Curr v. Helene Transportation Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API