Legal Opinion

Mavis Hosiery Co. v. Pennsylvania Transportation Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 28, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtChilvers, J.

The plaintiff has not established that the shipment moved over a route other than the one usually followed by the defendant’s trucks. It has, therefore, failed to establish a deviation from the defendant’s Unes. (Goetze & Co. v. Beam’s Owm, Inc., 199 N. Y. Supp. 790.)

Leaving the truck unguarded was an act of negligence which is chargeable to the defendant. But a limitation of the amount of liability, as distinguished from a limitation of liability, is valid even though negligence is not expressly mentioned. (Boyle v. Bush Terminal R. R. Co., 210 N. Y. 389.)

The question is resolved, therefore,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyle v. . Bush Terminal R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. United Lead Co. v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. H. R Mallison & Co. v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API