Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldman v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1982No. 2-582A126Published

1DissentBuchanan, Chief Judge

I must dissent.

The unambiguous mandate of Ind.Code 22-4-15-l(d)(2) is that medical substantiation of an employee’s disability must be given to his employer prior to termination. Raham v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, (1980) Ind. App., 405 N.E.2d 606. See also Huber v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, (1981) Ind.App., 422 N.E.2d 1257. The plain meaning of the words of the controlling statute, “medically substantiated disability,” requires more than the employer’s awareness of a medical problem; a physician’s statement is needed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raham v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Wilson v. StantonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Huber v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API