Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Texas v. Soileau (In Re Soileau)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2007No. 05-20501Published

1Concurrence

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge,

specially concurring:

I concur in the judgment only. With due respect to the majority, Hood and Katz may dispose of any Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity claim that Texas could raise here,1 but those cases do not resolve whether the Bankruptcy Code in fact authorizes the discharge of Soileau’s defaulted bail bonds. Currently, this court’s precedent equates default on bail bonds with any other contractual obligation and holds such debts dischargeable. Hickman v. Texas (In re Hickman), 260 F.3d 400, 406 (5th Cir.2001). The State has consistently argued, however,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Central Virginia Community College v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. SellersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Vance v. RouttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API