Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Graff

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of the city of Aurora; the Hon. Richard G. Montony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

This appeal appears to have been taken for delay only.

The action was assumpsit on promissory notes against two persons, one of whom, only, was served with process, and appeared and pleaded to the action.

One of the pleas was infancy, to which three replications by leave were filed: the first, denying infancy; the second, that the notes were given for necessaries; and third, a promise to pay after arriving at lawful age. There was also a plea of no consideration, and issue thereon.

To the second and third replications of plaintiff to the plea of infancy, there was no rejoinder, and no issue made…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strohm v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Seavey v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People ex rel. Lane v. LindblomIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. West Chicago Street Railway Co. v. KruegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Ryan v. McGirrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API