Legal Opinion

Smith v. Biggs Boiler Works Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 3, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, Vice-Chancellor:

Plaintiff and defendant Krizanek were each the holder of 50% of the outstanding common stock of The Biggs Boiler Works Company, a Delaware corporation. Subsequently Krizanek transferred a one-sixth interest to a third party. Plaintiff is a resident of the State of Connecticut; the individual defendants are residents of the State of Ohio. On December 6, 1950, at Cleveland, Ohio, plaintiff and defendant Krizanek executed an agreement, purporting to be a voting trust agreement, and naming the plaintiff and the individual defendants as the voting trustees for this stock.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. May v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. French v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Matter of Morse (Bank of America)New York Court of Appeals · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  2. Alaska Interstate Company v. McMillianDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Massa v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Massey v. St. Joseph Bank and Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Smith v. Biggs Boiler Works Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API