Legal Opinion
People v. Stephen
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided February 10, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*383OPINION OF THE COURT
Marcy L. Kahn, J.
Defendant Paul Stephen is charged with disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [1]) and resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30). An additional count of disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20 [3]) was previously dismissed on the People’s motion.
In a pretrial omnibus motion, defendant has moved to dismiss the remaining disorderly conduct count on the grounds that Penal Law § 240.20 (1) on its face and as applied to him unconstitutionally penalizes protected forms of expression; to dismiss both of the remaining charges in the accusatory instrument as facially…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SzymkiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. BaccalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- People v. PrisinzanoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
- State v. AlbarelliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- People v. MohamadouCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.