Commonwealth v. Drummond
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
The defendant, Luis Drummond, was convicted of armed robbery while masked, G. L. c. 265, § 17, based in part on a confession he made to a detective when the two were alone in a police interrogation room. Because the interrogation had not been recorded, the defendant requested and received a jury instruction pursuant to Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423, 447-448 (2004). However, the trial judge blunted the impact of the instruction by telling jurors they could disregard it if they *626found that the defendant had in essence declined to have the interrogation recorded after being…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. StoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RousseauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. DavilaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. LavalleeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017