Legal Opinion
Hawaiian Dredging Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 9, 2004No. 03-2763CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This is a post-award bid protest before the court after argument on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendant’s and in-tervenors’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff submitted bids on two separate dredging contracts with bonds accompanied by powers of attorney *306containing mechanically applied signatures. The contracting officer determined both bids to be nonresponsive because the powers of attorney lacked original signatures. After being denied relief through an agency-level protest, plaintiff brought the present action in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Akal Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Heritage of America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- United Enterprise & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc.-Birmingham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Geo-Seis Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.