State v. Cuthbert

¶64 (dissenting in part) — I agree with the majority opinion upholding 16 of Ronald James Cuthbert’s (Cuthbert) 17 convictions. But because evidence of the restraining order finding Cuthbert in contempt but authorizing him to keep the funds he misappropriated was *347irrelevant, I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion holding that the trial court abused its discretion and erred by excluding the restraining order from the jury’s consideration.

¶65 Relevant evidence is that which tends to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more…