Legal Opinion

State v. Metoyer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1998No. 97-KA-2266PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

720 So.2d 148 (1998)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Karon METOYER.

No. 97-KA-2266.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

October 7, 1998.

Harry F. Connick, District Attorney of Orleans Parish, Charles E. F. Heuer, Assistant District Attorney of Orleans, New Orleans, for The State of Louisiana.

Robert Glass, Glass & Reed, New Orleans, for The Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARRY, PLOTKIN and LANDRIEU, JJ.

PLOTKIN, Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the defendant is entitled to a new trial because of the discovery of new evidence. We hold that defendant has met the standard of La. C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PrudholmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. State v. TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. State v. HammonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. State v. KnapperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BradfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. State v. VentryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. State v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Metoyer v. ConnickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. WoodsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API