State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Appellant Smith raises ten propositions of law. We have reviewed each one and have determined that none justifies reversal of Smith’s conviction for aggravated murder and the other crimes he committed. Pursuant to R.C. 2929.05(A), we have also independently reviewed the record, weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Smith’s convictions and death sentence.
Inquiry on Racial Bias/Effective Assistance
In his first proposition of law, Smith asserts that…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.