Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2000No. 98-552PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Appellant Smith raises ten propositions of law. We have reviewed each one and have determined that none justifies reversal of Smith’s conviction for aggravated murder and the other crimes he committed. Pursuant to R.C. 2929.05(A), we have also independently reviewed the record, weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Smith’s convictions and death sentence.

Inquiry on Racial Bias/Effective Assistance

In his first proposition of law, Smith asserts that…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API