Legal Opinion

Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. Inserra

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2009No. ED 91760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

The defendant landowner, Mabel Inser-ra, brings this interlocutory appeal of the order and judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. The trial court upheld the blighting determination made by the City of St. Louis Board of Aider-men (the Board) and condemned the landowner’s property so that the plaintiff, the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Louis (LCRA), may proceed with development. Because the Board’s legislative determination of blight is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Binger v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Atmos Energy Corp. v. Public Service Commission of the StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Ruth Campbell v. County Commission of Franklin County, Defendant/Respondent, and Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Intervenor-Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, EX REL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES v. FOWLER LAND COMPANY, INC., and MARGARET LEIST REVOCABLE TRUST, SANDY RUNNELS and LINDA HENDERSON, TRUSTEESMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API