Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Washington Free Community v. State's Attorney of Montgomery County

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 5, 1970No. Civ. No. 20610Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSobeloff, Circuit Judge

This case presents one more attempt to breathe life into the Ober Act, the fatal defects of which the Supreme Court exposed in Whitehill v. Elkins, 389 U.S. 54, 88 S.Ct. 184, 19 L.Ed.2d 228 (1967). I believe that we should not hesitate now to sign the death certificate for this long-lingering corpse. Since the Grand Jury specifically charged to investigate possible violations of the Ober Act by this plaintiff has been discharged without having taken action I agree that there is no need for an injunction at this time.1 However, that determination should be without prejudice to the right of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API