Legal Opinion

Randall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 28, 1992No. 91-3645PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Eric A. Randall appeals from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the record fails to conclusively show that Randall is entitled to no relief under two of his claims, we reverse. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g).

Randall claims that he was prejudiced by the trial judge’s failure to establish, in the record, the necessary factual basis for the plea, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975). The record before us does not show that the trial judge complied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. Mendyk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API