Legal Opinion

Jaimes v. Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority (LMHA)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1987No. Nos. 86-3518, 86-3561PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development challenge a judgment requiring compliance with an affirmative action plan imposed by the court in an effort to desegregate public housing in Toledo, Ohio. We conclude that certain of the plan’s provisions may not legitimately be enforced while others remain appropriate as narrowly-tailored remedies for past discrimination. The order of the district court is, therefore, affirmed in part and reversed in part, and we order the defendants to undertake…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Wygant v. Jackson Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jaimes v. Lucas Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API