Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hershey v. Clark

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1894No. 5977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original application for mandamus. cited: Richardson v. Pratt, 20 Neb., 196; Richardson v. Doty, 25 Neb., 420. cited: State v. Eberhardt, 14 Neb., 203; State v. Scott, 17 Neb., 690; People v. Martin, 4 Neb., 54; McGee v. State, 32 Neb., 149; State v. Graham, 21 Neb., 354.

1Opinion of the CourtNoryal, C. J.

On the 3d day of February, 1893, the relator, John H. Hershey, applied to this court for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, John H. Clark, as county treasurer of Lincoln county, to receive from the relator the amount of money due the state on a school land *900contract of purchase for the southwest quarter of section 16, township 14, range 32 west of the 6th principal meridian, entered into by the state with one C. S. Guthrie, and by mesne assignments now owned by the relator, and to issue to him a receipt for said money. The issues were formed by proper pleadings, whereupon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. DotyNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. GrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Smith v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulhall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Stewart v. HentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Cooley v. SpirkNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API