Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer & Co Inc v. Mitchell

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 5, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00067Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC., CASE NO. C23-67 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 v. 13 STEVEN MITCHELL, DORI MITCHELL, JEROME HOPPER, and 14 LORI HOPPER, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and 18 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 69, 71.) Having reviewed the Motions, 19 the Responses (Dkt. Nos. 76, 78), the Replies (Dkt. Nos. 80, 81), and all supporting materials, 20 the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API