Legal Opinion

Red Bird Bank of Dallas v. Crocker National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1984No. 05-82-01323-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

CARVER, Justice.

Red Bird Bank appeals from a trial court ruling sustaining Crocker National Bank’s special appearance. Red Bird claims this ruling was error because: (1) Crocker has sufficient contacts with Texas to subject it to in personam jurisdiction; (2) 12 U.S.C.A. § 94 (West 1945) does not mandate venue in California because Crocker fits within the “branch bank” exception; and (3) 12 U.S.C.A. § 94 (West 1945) does not mandate venue in California because Crocker waived its application by improperly asserting its venue rights in a special appearance motion. We hold that 12 U.S.C.A. § 94…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Texas Highway Department v. JarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. West v. City National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. New Jersey Bank (N. A.) v. KnuckleyTexas Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API