Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided October 3, 2013No. Civil Case No. 1:11-cv-00301-MR-DLHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 49].
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Plaintiff Jessica T. Simpson (“Plaintiff’) initiated this action on June 10, 2011 against the Defendant Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amylin”) by filing a Complaint in the Buncombe County General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, alleging that she was terminated from her employment on the basis of her sex and because of her pregnancy, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKinney v. Cleveland County Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022