Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Harms

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1978No. 10924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

The notice of appeal and jurisdictional statement filed in this case show on their face that we lack jurisdiction and the purported appeal must be dismissed.

The notice of appeal recites that the heirs of petitioner Belford Joe Harms seek to prosecute the appeal and is signed by an attorney as “attorney for petitioner.”

The jurisdictional statement shows that after Belford Joe Harms initiated dissolution of marriage proceedings against his wife, Nina Mary Harms, the court heard evidence of the parties on three occasions. Thereafter, a proposed decree was reviewed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Heil v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leventhal v. LeventhalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of JamisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Winters v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Bishop v. EckhardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Bakker v. Employee Savings Plan of McDonnell Douglas Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API