Fruin-Bambrick Construction Co. v. Jones
Missouri Court of Appeals
The court erred in holding that the notice of intention to file lien, offered in evidence, was insufficient. R. S. 1889, sec. 6723; Putnam v. Ross, 46 Mo. 338; Henry v. Plitt, 84 Mo. 237; Miller v. Hoffman, 26 Mo. App. 202; Steinman v. Strimple, 29 Mo. App. 478; Dewitt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 266; Bambrickv. Webster Groves Ass’n, 53 Mo. App. 240; Midland v. Kreeger, 52 Mo. App. 421; Wade on Notice, sec. 640; Shaw v. Bryan, 39 Mo.
Read the full summary
The court erred in holding that the notice of intention to file lien, offered in evidence, was insufficient. R. S. 1889, sec. 6723; Putnam v. Ross, 46 Mo. 338; Henry v. Plitt, 84 Mo. 237; Miller v. Hoffman, 26 Mo. App. 202; Steinman v. Strimple, 29 Mo. App. 478; Dewitt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 266; Bambrickv. Webster Groves Ass’n, 53 Mo. App. 240; Midland v. Kreeger, 52 Mo. App. 421; Wade on Notice, sec. 640; Shaw v. Bryan, 39 Mo. App. 523; Bank v. Schaumberg, 38 Mo. 228; Grace v. Nisbet, 109 Mo. 19; Phillips on Mechanics’ Lien, sec. 16. (1) One who furnishes materials to a subcontractor of a…
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
The defendants, Jones and Mara, did the stone work of a building erected by their codefendant, the Blackmer & Post Pipe Company, a corporation. Alexander Hughes, the original contractor, sublet the work to Delaney Brothers, who in turn sublet it to Jones and Mara. This is an action against Jones and Mara for the value of building stone furnished by plaintiff, and which was used in the construction of the building, and also to enforce a mechanic’s lien against the improvements. It was undisputed on the trial that the plaintiff furnished the materials, that they were of the value claimed, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- De Witt v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Mundt v. Sheboygan & Fond du Lac RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Donaldson v. Wood & WoodCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Henry v. PlittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kenefick & Hammond v. Norwich Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Hertel Electric Company v. GabrielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Coleman v. HageySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Jordan v. Natrona Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- City of St. Louis ex rel. Contracting & Supply Co. v. Hill-O'Meara Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.