Legal Opinion

In re Will of Notley

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

MOTION EOR REHEARING.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

(Galbraith, X, dissenting.)

The court having held, ante, p. 435, that the trial judge did not err in directing a verdict for the proponents of a will and codicils, on the ground that there was no evidence upon which the jury could properly find for the contestants on the issue of undue influence, the contestants now move for a rehearing upon the following grounds:

1. That the decision is in conflict with an express statute to which the attention of the court was not drawn and which was overlooked by the court. The statute relied on is C.L., Sec. 1355, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Harbottle v. RawlinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Territory of Hawaii v. RobelloHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brown v. SpreckelsHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bannister v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In re the Will of NotleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API