Legal Opinion

Dierksen v. Albert

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

106 N.J. Super. 220 (1969)

254 A.2d 809

HERMAN H. DIERKSEN AND JESSIE M. DIERKSEN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

EVELYN ALICE ALBERT AND ANDREA J. ALBERT, JR., HER HUSBAND; PETER D. ALBERT, KATHERINE ALBERT AND JEANNE LOUISE ALBERT; AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF MAINE; AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK; CHAS. PFIZER & CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE; CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK; GULF OIL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Swayze v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Frazier v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Swayze v. HuntingtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  5. Bendix v. Hudson County National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Warner, Berman & Spitz, PANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Canova v. CanovaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Sleeper v. SleeperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API