Legal Opinion

People v. Orloff

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 2016No. 2d Crim. B266933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYegan, Acting P.J.

*950 A person confined to a wheelchair is capable of making a criminal threat. Here the threats were directed to a peace officer and a pharmacy manager. Similar prior threats were directed to workers' compensation judges. We have compassion for a person confined to a wheelchair. However, pain and suffering does not give license to threaten people.

Sergius Apostolos Orloff appeals from the judgment entered after a jury had convicted him of making a criminal threat (Pen. Code, § 422 ) 1 and attempting, by means of a threat, to deter an executive officer from performing his duties. (§ 69.) The trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. (HC) Messer v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. (HC) Nixon v. MoralesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. People v. Garcia CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API