Legal Opinion

Crane v. Schaefer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in case fdr deceit. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Abthub H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

The first point urged against the judgment in this case is that the declaration states no cause of action, and that consequently the motion in arrest after verdict should have been granted.

This position is based on the argument—to ube the language of the plaintiff in error’s brief—“that the existence of those things which constitute a lien at law is one of the indispensable elements of the plaintiff’s case,” and “a conclusion of law being substituted therefor, there is a complete failure to state a cause of action, and such a pleading cannot be aided by verdict.”

Before reciting the particular…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Endsley v. JohnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Drew v. BeallIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Germania Fire Insurance v. KlewerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Eames v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. MatualAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. McVeigh v. McGurrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Thompson v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Carlton v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  5. Greene v. KeithleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API