Legal Opinion · Dissent

Christensen v. Carson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1995No. 18717Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

The proposed ordinance is within the proper scope of the initiative power.

South Dakota Constitution, art. Ill, § 1 provides to the people the right to refer legislative acts to a public vote. Municipalities are specifically subject to initiative and referendum. Id. South Dakota was the first state to reserve legislative powers to its citizens by initiative and referendum. Wyatt v. Kundert, 375 N.W.2d 186, 192 (S.D.1985). “Initiative is the constitutional reservation of power in the people to propose bills and laws and to enact or reject them at the polls independent of the legislative…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Richards v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Klosterman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Byre v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Sharpe v. HittOhio Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API