Burns & McConnoughy v. Parish
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Error to the Nicholas Circuit. ' Case. Case 4. The case
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Marshall
delivered the opinion of the Court.
/ This action of assumpsit was brought by Parish against Burns & McConnoughy, for money averred to have been paid for their use and at their request, under the following circumstances: Burns & McConnoughy being partners in a mill and farm, a note was executed by McCon*9noughy individually, with Parish asbissurety, for the hire of a negro man, for the year 1838, for the use of the firm of Burns & McConnoughy; the said negro man having been, at the date of the note, in the joint service and employment of the firm, and having so remained throughout…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. Hite'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Gray v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Hoskins v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Donegan v. MoranNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Faris v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901