Legal Opinion

Burns & McConnoughy v. Parish

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 9, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Nicholas Circuit. ' Case. Case 4. The case

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

/ This action of assumpsit was brought by Parish against Burns & McConnoughy, for money averred to have been paid for their use and at their request, under the following circumstances: Burns & McConnoughy being partners in a mill and farm, a note was executed by McCon*9noughy individually, with Parish asbissurety, for the hire of a negro man, for the year 1838, for the use of the firm of Burns & McConnoughy; the said negro man having been, at the date of the note, in the joint service and employment of the firm, and having so remained throughout…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Hite'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Gray v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  3. Hoskins v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  4. Donegan v. MoranNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Faris v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API