Bride v. Stormer
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Huffman
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a foreclosure proceeding brought by appellants, who were the holders of notes secured by a trust deed on certain real estate. The right of foreclosure is not in dispute. It appears that at a sale of the lands herein, made by the master pursuant to a foreclosure decree, the lands were sold to Stormer, who later received a master’s deed therefor. After Stormer became the owner of the premises under the master’s deed, he executed four notes aggregating $12,000, payable to himself, and indorsed by him. These notes were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First State Bank v. MussigbrodMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Strause v. DutchIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Walsh v. Van HornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
- Donner v. WhitecottonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1919
- Lewis v. MattesonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Chatham Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- In re Estate of MaloneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- First National Bank of Chicago v. MarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940