Legal Opinion
Melkonian v. Goldman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 21, 1994No. 94-2325PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
647 So.2d 1008 (1994)
Kyle MELKONIAN, Petitioner,
v.
Hon. Murray GOLDMAN, etc., Respondent.
No. 94-2325.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 21, 1994.
Kyle Melkonian, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before HUBBART, JORGENSON, and GERSTEN, JJ.
2Per curiam
Perfecting a dissent is the only judicial task of lasting import that an individual appellate judge may embark upon alone. This maxim of collective judicial action governs the undertakings of supreme court justices and judges of the district courts of appeal, and…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Flagship Nat. Bank of Miami v. TestaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Puckett v. GentryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Bathurst v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
4Cited by7 opinions
- Oceania Joint Venture v. OCEAN VIEW, LTD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Jimenez v. RateniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Loftis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Montero v. Oak Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.