Schoen v. Gilbert
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentDaniel S. Pearson, Judge
I respectfully dissent. First, the majority’s decision is anachronous in light of this State’s adoption eight years ago of a comparative negligence rule. Second, the majority’s decision is unsound even when tested under the displaced law of contributory negligence.
A
As is so explicit in Yoder v. Greenwald, 246 So.2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), Florida’s “step in the dark” rule, namely, that one who enters a totally unfamiliar area in the darkness is not ordinarily justified in proceeding without first ascertaining whether there are obstacles to safe progress, is a rule of contributory negligence.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- AUBURN MACH. WORKS, CO., INC. v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Pittman v. Volusia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Metropolitan Dade County v. YelvingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.