Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schoen v. Gilbert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 21, 1981No. 80-163Published

1DissentDaniel S. Pearson, Judge

I respectfully dissent. First, the majority’s decision is anachronous in light of this State’s adoption eight years ago of a comparative negligence rule. Second, the majority’s decision is unsound even when tested under the displaced law of contributory negligence.

A

As is so explicit in Yoder v. Greenwald, 246 So.2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), Florida’s “step in the dark” rule, namely, that one who enters a totally unfamiliar area in the darkness is not ordinarily justified in proceeding without first ascertaining whether there are obstacles to safe progress, is a rule of contributory negligence.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Blackburn v. DortaSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. AUBURN MACH. WORKS, CO., INC. v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Pittman v. Volusia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Metropolitan Dade County v. YelvingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API