Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Pate

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1965No. 10482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek damages for personal injuries received by the wife and for related expenses incurred by the community allegedly resulting from a collision between the vehicle driven by Mrs. Beasley and that driven by Mrs. Barbara Pate. Among the parties made defendant was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company under an “uninsured motorist” provision of a policy issued to plaintiff by defendant company. From judgment against State Farm and in favor of Mrs. Beasley for $5,000 and rejecting the husband’s demands, only defendant insurance company appeals.

The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. James v. MaggioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Faulkner v. MalloyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API