Legal Opinion

Wright & Moreno, L.L.C. v. Clement

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 2004No. 04-1097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJjPETERS, J.

Dr. Richard Clement and his wife, Emily (the Clements), appeal a portion of a default judgment entered against them by the trial court in favor of Wright & Moreno, L.L.C. (Wright & Moreno). For the following reasons, we affirm the award of attorney fees and reverse the award of penalties.

DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD

Wright & Moreno is a professional limited liability company performing legal services for clients. Between May 1, 2002, and February 28, 2003, it performed legal services for the Clements and billed them $5,834.92 for the services rendered. When the Clements failed to pay for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ancona's Stop & Save, Inc. v. Cleo Fields & Associates, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lafayette Parish School Board v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Second Injury BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Lafayette Parish School Board v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Second Injury BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Reich, Album & Plunkett, L.L.C. Versus Gaston Mugnier and Coastal Development Group, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API