Legal Opinion

Edrosa v. Chau

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00088Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARDO EDROSA, Case No.: 19cv88-CAB-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DETERMINING THAT IN 13 v. FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS SHOULD NOT CONTINUE ON 14 JOHN K. CHAU, Medical Doctor; et al., APPEAL [Doc. No. 60] 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Bernardo Edrosa is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 11, 19 2020, this Court issued an order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss the First 20 Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 55], and judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. St. Elizabeth Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  4. Hollis v. Director of CorrectionsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API