Legal Opinion

Sandusky v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1989No. 88-310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The creditor bank, appellee, negligently failed to secure federal mortgage insurance protection on its loans to appellants. Upon default and foreclosure the chancellor granted a deficiency judgment against appellants. The appellants contend that the bank’s negligent failure to secure mortgage insurance should have excused them from the deficiency judgment. The chancellor ruled correctly, and, accordingly, we affirm.

The appellants, Timothy and Rose Sandusky, obtained four (4) loans from the appellee, First National Bank of Sikeston, Missouri. The loans were secured by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Padgett v. HastonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Batesville Truck Line, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Burdan v. WaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elliott v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Dent v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. McCollem v. ChidneseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Platte Valley Savings v. CrallColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Arkansas Teacher Retirement Sys. v. Coronado Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API