Hartt v. Harvey
New York Supreme Court
Motion to continue an injunction, and motion to modify an injunction. The nature of the action and the facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMullin, J.
—In order to decide the motions made in this cause, an investigation of the merits, to some extent, is necessary, and the facts essential to an understanding of the case are briefly these: In March last, the annual meeting for the election of trustees was held by the religious society located in this city, duly incorporated and known as the Society of the Church of the Puritans. The defendants, White and Smith, were duly appointed inspectors of the election, pursuant to the provisions of the general law relating to the incorporation of religious societies. At the election, sixty-four votes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the election of Directors of the Long Island RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Mickles v. Rochester City BankNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- In re the election of Directors of The Chenango County Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1839
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. SteersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Salgo v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Howell v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Plowman v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Shumate v. Supervisors of Fauquier CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.