Legal Opinion
United States v. Palmer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1997No. 95-21027, 96-20109PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Defendants were convicted of mail and wire fraud for engaging in a nationwide telemarketing scheme. Stacy Anne Palmer argues that her conviction was barred by double jeopardy, that her trial should have been severed from that of DeBlasio, and that the district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines. Samuel Lloyd DeBlasio argues his counsel was ineffective and that his sentence was miscalculated. We are compelled to conclude that Palmer has waived both her double jeopardy and severance claims. We affirm the district court’s application of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. PowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Richard Carr v. Michael O'Leary and Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Raul Javier Stevens Alejandro StevensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.