Legal Opinion

In re Kenyon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 9, 2000No. 25201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement under Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a definite suspension from the practice of law for a period of one year, to run concurrent with the indefinite suspension he is currently serving.1 We accept the agreement. The facts in the agreement are as follows.

Respondent was named as a defendant in a Virginia civil action entitled Waverly L. Berkley, III, R. Arthur Jett, Jr., Carter B.S. Furr, John D. Padgett, a partnership d/b/a Jett,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of KenyonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re KenyonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API