Legal Opinion
Charles T. Wilson v. Airtherm Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2006No. 04-3679PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Former employees of Airtherm Products, Inc. (API) sued API for failing to notify them of a plant closing as required by the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-09 (2000), before API sold its business to Airtherm LLC (ALLC). Concluding that API violated the WARN Act by terminating its employees’ employment without guaranteeing that ALLC would hire the employees after the sale was concluded, the District Court granted summary judgment to the former employees and awarded damages in the amount of $515,661.92. Reviewing de novo the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnsides v. Mj Optical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Carles Joe Smullin v. Mity Enterprises, Inc. Do Group Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- International Alliance Of Theatrical And Stage Employees And Moving Picture Machine Operators, Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Compact Video Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union & Its Local 4-612 v. CIT Group/Capital Equipment Financing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Robert Cisar Suzanne Munns, Appellants/cross v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Appellee/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. Airtherm Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006