Legal Opinion
United States v. Ganadonegro
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided February 14, 2012No. CR 09-0312 JBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count 3, filed December 6, 2011 (Doc. 218)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on February 2, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) the Court should dismiss Count 3 in the Superseding Indictment, filed November 9, 2011 (Doc. 201), on the basis that the charged New Mexico state offense is not properly assimilated into federal law under the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), 18 U.S.C. § 13; and (ii) whether the Court should dismiss Count 3 in the Superseding Indictment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n ex rel. First Security Bank, N.A. v. Southeastern New Mexico Affordable Housing Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- United States v. VigilDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- AerSale, Inc. v. The City of Roswell, New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023