Legal Opinion
Stertz v. Gulf Oil Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 4, 1982No. 78 Civ. 1813PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs in this action allege that they bought refined products from the defendant, Gulf Oil Corporation (“Gulf”), during the period 1973 through 1975. They claim that Gulf wilfully overcharged them for these products, in violation of Section 210 of the Economic Stabilization Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1904 (note) (“ESA”). Plaintiffs seek to recover the amount of the alleged overcharge, trebled, as allowed under certain circumstances by Section 210 of the ESA.
Plaintiffs now move to certify the class they wish to represent. Although this class was initially…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- General Motors Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Standard Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- STATE OF MINN. BY HUMPHREY v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
- Stertz v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stertz v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983