Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Lokuta

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 2011No. 1 MAP 2010Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Baer

I concur in the result reached by the Majority Opinion; however, I write separately to articulate my analysis of the recusal issue, the scope of the remand order, and the strength of the argument in favor of a new evidentiary hearing on sanctions. Before turning to these specific issues, I address overarching considerations relating to the history of this case and why I am ultimately able to join the determination of the Majority Opinion. I also briefly review the procedural history of this case.

In many ways, this Court and the Court of Judicial Discipline (CJD) are sailing in uncharted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Joseph v. Scranton Times L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. In Re LokutaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. In Re LokutaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API