Legal Opinion

Temple v. Bushell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1974No. Nos. 71-1834, 71-2135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Each of the appellants in these two cases was summarily suspended from his job by appellees pending an administrative determination as to whether he should be permanently removed from the postal service. Neither appellant sought to exhaust his available administrative remedies. Instead, each independently brought suit in district court to enjoin his suspension pending a full administrative hearing, alleging that the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment requires a pre-suspension administrative hearing.

In Temple’s case, the trial court denied his motion for a preliminary injunction…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Francois v. BushellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'HARA v. Commissioner of Public SafetyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and DispensarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and DispensarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Wade H. Temple, Jr. v. John F. Bushell, as Postmaster of Oakland, California, Terry M. Francois v. John F. Bushell, as Postmaster of Oakland, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API