Ray v. Koester

PER CURIAM. *

The first issue in this pro se appeal is whether the district court concluded cor rectly that a suggestion of death filed by defendant Koester’s attorney in August 2002 began the 90-day period for filing a motion to substitute party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). We review de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Bellaire General Hosp. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 97 F.3d 822, 827 (5th Cir.1996). The second issue is whether the district court declined properly to grant Ray a second extension of time in which to comply. This…