Legal Opinion

Estate of Bacon v. Bacon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1991No. Nos. 89-2375, 89-2594, 90-229 and 90-1061Published

1Per curiam

The summary judgment against the estate was incorrectly entered because it was at that time represented only by a person whose interests were obviously adverse. See Edmonson v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc., 171 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (adverse interest renders appointment of administrator ad litem jurisdictionally required even though not requested; judgment obtained in absence of such appointment void); § 733.308, Fla.Stat. (1989); see also In re Estate of Bell, 573 So.2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

On the merits, the judgments against both the estate and the beneficiaries were likewise erroneous…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shambow v. ShambowSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Edmonson v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Hyde Shipping Corp. v. Concreto Asfaltico Nacional, S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Puritan Insurance Co. v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API