Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Lawler v. City of West Palm Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 15, 1936Published

1Dissent

We have held that a tax levied and collected for one purpose cannot be diverted to another and different purpose. State, exrel. Keefe, v. Cotton, 106 Fla. 743, 143 So. 644; Oven v. Ausley,106 Fla. 455, 143 So. 588; Chamberlain v. City of Tampa, 40 Fla. 74, 23 So. 572. The levy as made was not unlawful, for it could have been compelled by mandamus. City of Wauchula v. State,115 Fla. 26, 154 So. 889; Treat v. State, 160 So. 498; State v. Lakeland, 150 So. 508, 112 Fla. 200.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Oven v. AusleySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Chamberlain v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  4. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Treat v. State Ex Rel. DannSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API